COGNITIVE POTENTIALS OF THE MALE BRAIN EVOKED BY PERCEIVINGHUMAN'S FACES WITH DIFFERENT EMOTIONAL MODALITIES
DOI 10.17721/1728.2748.2023.92.33-37
Keywords:
електроенцефалографія, викликані потенціали, потенціали, пов'язані з подією, зорові потенціали, емоції, статеві відмінностіAbstract
The calculation of the difference in peaks of the event-related potential in men during exposure to different-sex faces with differential emotional modality using the MATLAB and EEGLAB software packages. The electrical activity of the brain of 20 male students of Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University was recorded to identify the difference in the activation of brain structures during the demonstration of portraits of different sexes with positive and negative emotional modalities. Statistically significant differences in peak amplitude were recorded for components N250, N400, and P300 when subjects were presented with male and female portraits with a positive emotional modality, while when exposed to a series of images with a negative emotional modality, no statistical differences were registered in any of the componenStatistically significant differences in the peak amplitude were recorded for the N250, N400, and P300 components when subjects were presented with male and female portraits with a positive emotional modality, while when exposed to a series of images with a negative emotional modality, no statistical differences were registered in any of the components.
References
Tsao DY, Livingstone MS. Mechanisms of face perception. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2008;31(1):411-437. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238
Rayi A, Murr N. Electroencephalogram. StatPearls; 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563295/
Yang YF, Brunet-Gouet E, Burca M, Kalunga EK, Amorim MA. Brain processes while struggling with evidence accumulation during facial emotion recognition: an ERP study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00340
Trevor Huff N, P T. Neuroanatomy, visual cortex. StatPearls; 2021. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482504/
Zeppieri C. Visual evoked potential (VEP). StatPearls; 2022. https://sydneynorthneurology.com.au/visual-evoked-potential-vep/#:~:text=A%20visual%20evoked%20potential%20is,on%20an%20electroencephalogram%20(EEG).
Creel D, Yu M. Visually evoked potentials. У: Handbook of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Springer International Publishing; 2019:19-28. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30417-1_2
Maeda Y, Yoon SY. A Meta-Analysis on Gender Differences in Mental Rotation Ability Measured by the Purdue Spatial Visualization Tests: Visualization of Rotations (PSVT:R). Educ Psychol Rev. 2012;25(1):69-94. doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x
Voyer D, Voyer SD, Saint-Aubin J. Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Amp Rev. 2016;24(2):307-334. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1085-7
Hansen T, Zaichkowsky J, de Jong A. Are women always better able to recognize faces? The unveiling role of exposure time. PLOS ONE. 2021;16(10):e0257741. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257741
Williams LM, Liddell BJ, Rathjen J та ін. Mapping the time course of nonconscious and conscious perception of fear: An integration of central and peripheral measures. Hum Brain Mapp. 2004;21(2):64-74. doi:10.1002/hbm.10154
Killgore WD, Yurgelun-Todd DA. Sex differences in amygdala activation during the perception of facial affect. Neuroreport. 2001;12(11):2543-2547. doi:10.1097/00001756-200108080-00050
Fischer H, Sandblom J, Nyberg L, Herlitz A, Bäckman L. Brain activation while forming memories of fearful and neutral faces in women and men. Emotion. 2007;7(4):767-773. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.767
Lee SA, Kim CY, Shim M, Lee SH. Gender Differences in Neural Responses to Perceptually Invisible Fearful Face—An ERP Study. Front Behav Neurosci. 2017;11. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00006
Morita Y, Morita K, Yamamoto M, Waseda Y, Maeda H. Effects of facial affect recognition on the auditory P300 in healthy subjects. Neurosci Res. 2001;41(1):89-95. doi:10.1016/s0168-0102(01)00248-6
Goffaux V, Gauthier I, Rossion B. Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. Cogn Brain Res. 2003;16(3):416-424. doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00056-9
de Haan M, Johnson MH, Halit H. Development of face-sensitive event-related potentials during infancy: a review. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003;51(1):45-58. doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00152-1
Hu R, Zhang L, Meng P, Meng X, Weng M. The Neural Responses of Visual Complexity in the Oddball Paradigm: An ERP Study. Brain Sci. 2022;12(4):447. doi:10.3390/brainsci12040447
Herrmann MJ, Ehlis AC, Muehlberger A, Fallgatter AJ. Source Localization of Early Stages of Face Processing. Brain Topogr. 2005;18(2):77-85. doi:10.1007/s10548-005-0277-7
Kim EY, Lee SH, Park G та ін. Gender Difference in Event Related Potentials to Masked Emotional Stimuli in the Oddball Task. Psychiatry Investig. 2013;10(2):164. doi:10.4306/pi.2013.10.2.164
Tanaka JW, Curran T, Porterfield AL, Collins D. Activation of Preexisting and Acquired Face Representations: The N250 Event-related Potential as an Index of Face Familiarity. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;18(9):1488-1497. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.9.1488
Herzmann G. Increased N250 amplitudes for other-race faces reflect more effortful processing at the individual level. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016;105:57-65. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.05.001
Schulz C, Kaufmann JM, Kurt A, Schweinberger SR. Faces forming traces: neurophysiological correlates of learning naturally distinctive and caricatured faces. NeuroImage. 2012;63(1):491-500. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.080
Kutas M, Federmeier KD. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62(1):621-647. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
Neumann MF, Schweinberger SR. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load. Brain Res. 2008;1239:181-190. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.039
Proverbio A. Neural markers of opposite-sex bias in face processing. Front Psychol. 2010;1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00169
Yamamoto M, Morita K, Tomita Y, Tsuji K, Kawamura K, Maeda H. Effect of facial affect stimuli on auditory and visual P300 in healthy subjects. Kurume Med J. 2000;47(4):285-290. doi:10.2739/kurumemedj.47.285
Yang Q, Zhang Y, Wang J, Wu Y. Processing facial expressions that conflict with their meanings to an observer: an event related potential study. Front Psychol. 2020;11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01273
Schupp HT, Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Junghöfer M. Emotion and attention: event-related brain potential studies. У: Understanding Emotions. Elsevier; 2006:31-51. doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56002-9
Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ. Affective picture processing: The late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology. 2000;37(2):257-261. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720257
Oliver-Rodriguez JC, Guan Z, Johnston VS. Gender differences in late positive components evoked by human faces. Psychophysiology. 1999;36(2):176-185. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3620176
