RESULTS OF THE OWLS’ (STRIGIFORMES, STRIGIDAE) COUNTS IN NATIONAL NATURE PARK "PYRIATYNSKYI" AND SURROUNDING AREA

doi.org/10.17721/1728.2748.2024.99.21-26

Authors

  • Vitalii KAZANNYK Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi", Pyriatyn, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7090-057X
  • Luna KOSOLAP Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Anatoliy PODOBAYLO Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine, National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi", Pyriatyn, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2958-8445
  • Nadiia MYLENKO National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi", Pyriatyn, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5007-0348
  • Tetiana BEZPALA National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi", Pyriatyn, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3902-8651

Keywords:

owls, counts, territorial distribution, number, vocalization, National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi"

Abstract

Background. The paper examines the distribution, number, voice activity of three species of owls from the Strigidae family typical for the National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi": Tawny Owl (Strix aluco), Long-eared Owl (Asio otus) and Little Owl (Athene noctua) according to the results annual accounts for an eight-year period.

Methods. The research was carried out according to the methodology, which included listening to the unprovoked vocalization of owls, and in its absence, the use of vocal provocation of birds in the evening twilight/darkness, followed by the registration of vocal signals or visual observation and counting of absolute numbers. Accounting was carried out in 35 localities during 2017-2024 at the beginning of the nesting period of owls.

Results. The most numerous species in the park is the Tawny Owl, the share of individuals among other species was on average 74,9%, the total number is at least 51-53 pairs. Less numerous is the Little Owl, the share is 16%, the number is 19 pairs. The smallest number was recorded for the Long-eared Owl (7,3%), but the number is estimated at 20 pairs; this species is not registered annually. The average effectiveness of the records at the observation points is 67,2% of the places where owls were detected against 32,8% of the points without birds. Most often, owls responded to vocal provocations – 69,9% of cases of meetings with birds. Independent vocalization was noted in 25,6% of encounters.

Conclusions. Bird activity is highly dependent on weather conditions: owls were most active in years when the weather was relatively warm and without significant precipitation and wind. In frosty and snowy periods of winter, some owl individuals may die from exhaustion. It was effective to involve volunteers in accounting work.

References

Akimov I. A. (Ed.). (2009). Red Data Book of Ukraine. Animal Kingdom. Hlobalkonsaltynh [in Ukrainian].

Choi, W., Lee, J. H., & Sung, H. (2019). A case study of male tawny owl (Strix aluco) vocalizations in South Korea: call feature, individuality, and the potential use for census. Animal Cells and Systems, 23(2), 90–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19768354.2019.1592022

Cooke, R., Grant, H., Ebsworth, I., Rendall R., Isaac, B., & White J. (2017). Can owls be used to monitor the impacts of urbanisation? A cautionary tale of variable detection. Wildlife Research, 44, 573–581. https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16185

Fabrizio, S. (2018). Raptor monitoring: challenges and benefits. Bird Study, 65, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2018.1552918

Finck, P. (1990). Seasonal variation of territory size with the Little Owl (Athene noctua). Oecologia, 83, 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00324636

Fuller, M., & Mosher, J. (1981). Methods of detecting and counting raptors: a review. Studies in avian biology, 6, 235–246.

Havrylenko, N. (1960). Findings of arctic and boreal birds in Poltava region. Ornithology, 3, 436–439 [in Russian].

Havryliuk, M., Kuzmenko, Y., & Bashta, A.-T. (Eds.) (2009, December 28). Wintering of Long-eared Owls in Ukraine. Ukrainian Birds of Prey Research Centre. https://raptors.org.ua/150 [in Russian].

Henrioux, F. (2002). Nest-site selection of the Long-eared Owl Asio otus in northwestern Switzerland. Bird Study, 49(3), 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650209461272.

Kathleen, С., & Stanley, A. (1997). Temporal, Climatic and Lunar Factors Affecting Owl Vocalizations of Western Wyoming. Journal of Raptor Research, 31(4), 358–363. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/jrr/vol31/iss4/11

Kazannyk, V., & Mylenko, N. (2013). Materials on the winter avifauna of National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi". Biodiversity inventory within the nature reserve fund (pp. 155–163). SNBG [in Ukrainian].

Kazannyk, V., & Mytropan, Y. (2019). Results of the Owl's (Strigiformes) counts on the territory of National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi" in 2017–2018. In V. Kazannyk, & Y. Mytropan (Eds.), Pyriatyn ecological readings (pp. 30–33) [in Ukrainian].

Kosolap, L., & Kazannyk, V. (2024). Population dynamics and species composition of the Owls (Strigiformes) of National Nature Park "Pyriatynskyi". "Shevchenkivska vesna: Advancements in life sciences" (pp. 138–141). SPOLOM [in Ukrainian].

Michelle, L., Stephen, B., & Grey, P. (2010). Factors Influencing the Detectability of Forest Owls in Southeastern Alaska. The Condor, 112(3), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.1525/cond.2010.090217

Redpath, S.M. (1994). Censusing Tawny Owls Strix aluco by the use of imita-tion calls. Bird Study, 41, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063659409477219

Vásquez, P. (1978). Fuller and Mosher 1987. Sampling (Statistics). Birds Of Prey. https://www.scribd.com/document/671543071/Fuller-and-Mosher-1987

Vrezec, Al., Duke, G., Kovács, A., Saurola, P., Wernham, C., Burfield, I., & Bertoncelj, I. (2012). Overview of raptor monitoring activities in Europe. Acrocephalus, 33, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10100-012-0003-y

https://meteopost.com/weather/climate [in Ukrainian].

Published

2025-10-14